Prime Minister Stephen Harper Prorogues Parliament: Massive “Turtle” or Clever Election Strategy?

The yellow-bellied turtle

The yellow-bellied turtle

On December 30th, two weeks after the House of Commons ended its last sitting of 2009, the Conservatives presented themselves with a belated Christmas gift, unexpectedly proroguing Parliament until March 3rd. It was to resume sitting on January 25th. As a result, the House of Commons will be vacant for nearly three months. The Conservatives assert that this is to allow them time to consult with Canadians, particularly regarding their economic action plan, before releasing their budget on March 4th. Is this what hockey fans would call “a turtle”, or is it a brilliant strategic move that once again demonstrates the Conservatives’ ability to outfox the Liberals?

Most Canadians have seen a few hockey fights. First there’s some verbal sparring, maybe some shoving, and then two guys go at it, sometimes by prior arrangement. It’s a good way to vent frustrations and stir up the crowd. Other times, a player is a pest or has done something that deserves some retribution. In this case, when the first punch is thrown the guy on the receiving end (the pest) refuses to fight back, unwilling to take the thumping he might richly deserve. He won’t put his money where is mouth is and either skates away or falls cowering to the ice, gloved hands covering his head – he is a turtle. The net result is that someone who deserved some payback doesn’t actually get much of it, and his team, in fact, gains an advantage.

Lately, the Conservatives have not been playing in a gentlemanly fashion, and the Liberals et al., however weakly, have been trying to hold them to account. When the Conservatives were threatened by the Afghan detainee scandal they opted to skate away from the game until March, rather than defend themselves. They turtled.

Because of the prorogation every bill on the order paper has died and all committee work has been stopped. This puts an end to every official opportunity for the Opposition to rein in the Conservatives and virtually assures that they will get no time in front of the media for two more months. The Liberals have already had trouble catching the imagination (or even attention) of Canadians and this is only going to make things worse.

By proroguing Parliament the Conservatives have escaped the immediate threat of the investigation into the Afghan detainee issue, and the Liberals have been quietly shuffled out to pasture. Now the Conservatives have plenty of time to go from riding to riding, doling out cash and favours before the throne speech and subsequent budget.

Between now and March 3rd they will not be sitting idly at home, munching on leftover Christmas bonbons. They will use this extra time to buy us with our own money, replacing doorknobs, erecting economic action plan signs, and kissing babies and auto workers. They also have time to round out the Senate with five of their own appointees even though they really, really hate doing that. The Prime Minister is many things, but stupid is not one of them. He is a consummate player of the game.

Predictably, the Liberal Party and their supporters are howling with outrage. They claim that this is arrogant, undemocratic, despotic, dictatorial and a number of other hyper-excitable adjectives. Of course none of these are really true. The Prime Minister is well within the bounds of constitutional law and prorogation requires the consent of the Governor General, which she gave.

Considering their own history of “friendly dictatorships”, the Liberal party seems a bit quick to criticize Mr. Harper. The Liberals, Bloc, and NDP were not above using the constitution in novel ways when they tried to take down the Conservatives with a coalition government. That move was widely criticized as undemocratic and seen as an effort to skirt the results of the recently held election. It seems that politicians only like the first-past-the-post system when they are beneficiaries of it.

Likely, the Liberals are angry on two fronts: one, they have yet again been outplayed at their own game by Mr. Harper, and two, they have to put on their big girl panties and prepare for a spring election. If you recall, the Liberals twice called early elections in hopes of taking advantage of disarray and vote splitting on the right. That shoe must pinch awfully tightly now that it’s on the other foot.

In a recent political commentary Don Newman pointed out that the Conservatives are calling the Liberals’ bluff and practically daring them to bring down the government in March. What the Liberal Party consistently fails to mention is that it (among others) has been presented with many opportunities to dethrone the Harper government and has yet to find the gumption to actually do it. The last time the Liberals tried the electorate was prepared to hand them their hats and send them waltzing out the door.

An EKOS political poll taken between December 9th and 15th showed that the Conservatives have 35.9% support among decided voters, continuing a slow decline that started in October. They are slipping further away from the 40% benchmark that is seen as necessary for a majority government. Wherever their support is leaking to, however, it isn’t the Liberal party, whose numbers remain virtually unchanged since the fall, at 26.7%.

Regionally, the Conservatives lead everywhere except Quebec, where the Bloc is in front and the Liberals are second. The only other circumstances in which the Liberals lead the Conservatives are among voters under 25 and in Toronto (quelle surprise). With 12% of voters undecided or unwilling to answer it appears that the Conservatives are not completely wrong to think that they might have a chance of winning their gamble. Most Canadians will barely notice that Parliament has not been in session; the detainees will be a distant memory, few care about the Senate, and many will be drunk on the sweet nectar of stimulus cash.

It appears that turtling, although reviled, does seem to get the job done – at least in the short term. Perhaps those on the left of the political spectrum will use the break to develop some coherent policy alternatives, something deeper than “anything but Conservative”. The Liberals in particular need to turn their attention to repairing their internal divides and get back to giving centre-leftists an unembarrassing place to call home.

The Conservatives need to work on being, or at least appearing, a little warmer, a little fuzzier, and a little more humble. They need to concentrate more on leading the country to better times without totally bankrupting us and less on the obliteration of their political opponents. Me, I’m just counting the days until March 3rd.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • email

Related posts:

  1. A Piece on Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his Decision to Prorogue Parliament The PM, proving to be quite uncreative when it comes...
  2. Stephen Harper Has No Need for Democracy – A Prorogued Parliament is a Silent One As I’ve arrived home from my Christmas holiday, I like...
  3. Baseless: Stephen Harper’s Liberal Solution HCBAX9NPSJB8 It is a truism that the Conservative’s base votes....
  4. Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s Cabinet Shuffle Firstly let us recall that the small government-touting Conservatives have...
  5. Stephen Harper Gambles on Prorogue Shutting Down Parliament Again For the second time in the space of one year,...

Tags: , , , ,

7 Responses to “Prime Minister Stephen Harper Prorogues Parliament: Massive “Turtle” or Clever Election Strategy?”

  1. Alejandro Soares Says:

    WHY DID STEPHEN HARPER PROROGUE PARLIAMENT? WHAT ARE 2 CRITICISMS REGARDING THIS PROROGATION?

  2. Abed O Says:

    haha, i see you alejandro!

  3. Rod Says:

    This is OUR parliament, not Harper’s parliament. Harper does NOT have the right to halt work. He has the RESPONSIBILITY to gainfully work for us. As a teacher, I would not be allowed to stop productive work for 2 months in order to plan. There is no legitimate reason to expect Harper to be any less productive than me.

    Since, in all likelihood, Harper’s proroguing decision will not be altered, then I suggest that Harper and his flock of sheep spend time learning and practising how to be collaborative so that the work in parliament can be accomplished. As of this moment, the Conservatives are not setting a good example of how to act as representatives of the people in our nation.

  4. Deidre Says:

    FYI:

    Jean Chretien prorogued Parliament four times during his time as Prime Minister: February 5, 1996; September 18, 1999; September 16, 2002; and November 12, 2003.

    * On each occasion, the Liberals killed their own legislation. Several bills ended up dying over and over again due to Liberals proroguing Parliament or calling early elections.

    * September 16, 2002 – After a summer of Liberal in-fighting and Jean Chretien being forced to announce his planned retirement date in August, Chretien prorogued Parliament, killing legislation so that he could unveil his legacy agenda.

    * According [to] Eddie Goldenberg, Chretien decided to have a Throne Speech just to test the will of the Martinite forces who were trying to push him out early: Chretien was happy. “I like that. It is exactly what we just discussed. Prepare me a statement. But just one more thing,” said the old fox. “I want a Throne Speech in the fall. The government will stand or fall on it. If they want to vote against me on it, then it is the one case in which I will run again.” (Eddie Goldenberg, The Way it Works, p. 380)

    * November 12, 2003 – Jean Chretien announced that Parliament was prorogued on the eve of the Liberal leadership convention (so Chretien and Martin didn’t have to sit together in the House of Commons and face a dispute over who was Prime Minister). Martin did not become Prime Minister until December 12, 2003 and Parliament did not resume until February 2, 2004 – almost four months later

    * The current session has lasted as long as many comparable sessions under the Liberals, and longer than several of the sessions under Jean Chretien and Paul Martin.

  5. Deidre Says:

    My source is from:
    http://davidakin.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2007/9/4/3207267.html

    And the politicians are still working, they’re just not in the same room arguing. They’re probably getting done more this way.

  6. RonMacDonald Says:

    What a disgrace, what a joke, our country is in limbo on the authority of one man, the person what was voted in and is paying paid a handsome wage. There have been so many examples during the past year of embarassments to our country on the world stage that it’s no surprise that he continues to show distain for all else. Get back to work! Show some leadership! Do the right thing!

  7. Gloria Says:

    Harper, seems to be taking a page from Campbells book. Use, abuse, lie, deny and to hell with the Canadian citizens, let them eat cake. The west has to separate from the east, and Harper can call Campbell to the east where he belongs. The West would be so much better off. This is a thought, people are now contemplating. Alberta, is having the same thoughts. The East has been their own country, as long as I can remember.
    The East, has profited, from the Wests tax dollars. There was even criticism, at the Olympics opening ceremonies, there was not enough french spoken. This is the attitude of the East, dictating to the West. The first language in Canada, are, the Aboriginal languages, not french. The East, has to stop cramming french down the throats, of the Western people.

Leave a Reply



Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).