<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Do Nov. 9 By-Elections (Yawn) Mean for Child, Youth, and Family Advocates?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedvote.ca/2009/10/20/what-do-nov-9-by-elections-yawn-mean-for-child-youth-and-family-advocates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedvote.ca/2009/10/20/what-do-nov-9-by-elections-yawn-mean-for-child-youth-and-family-advocates/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-do-nov-9-by-elections-yawn-mean-for-child-youth-and-family-advocates</link>
	<description>Informed Vote (informedvote.ca) will keep Canadian voters informed on Canadian Politics such as Stephen Harper, Michael Ignatieff, Jack Layton, Liberals, Conservatives, NDP, Green, as well as foreign issues like the Israel palestine conflict and local issues like the CUPE strike</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 07:31:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelvin Manion</title>
		<link>http://informedvote.ca/2009/10/20/what-do-nov-9-by-elections-yawn-mean-for-child-youth-and-family-advocates/comment-page-1/#comment-5313</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelvin Manion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informedvote.ca/?p=1095#comment-5313</guid>
		<description>Extremely interesting blog post thanks for writing it I just added your blog to my bookmarks and will be back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extremely interesting blog post thanks for writing it I just added your blog to my bookmarks and will be back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Dent</title>
		<link>http://informedvote.ca/2009/10/20/what-do-nov-9-by-elections-yawn-mean-for-child-youth-and-family-advocates/comment-page-1/#comment-3935</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Dent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informedvote.ca/?p=1095#comment-3935</guid>
		<description>What a facinating blog. I&#039;ve bookmarked it and added your feed to my RSS Reader</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a facinating blog. I&#8217;ve bookmarked it and added your feed to my RSS Reader</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne Melcombe</title>
		<link>http://informedvote.ca/2009/10/20/what-do-nov-9-by-elections-yawn-mean-for-child-youth-and-family-advocates/comment-page-1/#comment-3517</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne Melcombe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informedvote.ca/?p=1095#comment-3517</guid>
		<description>There is a transit credit already -- the federal Cons&#039; website IDs it as one of the things they&#039;ve done for families. However, it only applies to people who buy monthly transit passes. In the GVR, if you use transit less than 40 times per month, it&#039;s not worth it to buy a monthly pass. So even you work a four-day week and use transit 32 times a month to get to and from work, you can&#039;t claim the tax credit.

Books and periodicals were not taxed (in BC) until the GST came in. This is not about complex funding agreements for education. It&#039;s about creating an exemption for the GST on books, etc, which are arguably instruments of learning (and democracy) no matter what age they&#039;re aimed at. According to deloitte.com, &quot;there will be point of sale rebates of the provincial portion of HST on motor fuels, books, children-sized clothing and footwear, children’s car seats and car booster seats, diapers and feminine hygiene products&quot; -- so books will continue to be taxed at 5% (current GST) instead of 12% (HST).

The HST may have been a federal initiative, but we wouldn&#039;t be having this discussion if Mulroney&#039;s conservatives hadn&#039;t brought in the GST in 1991. I don&#039;t recall writing that I expect an army of protesters; I wrote that the Conservatives claiming on their website that reducing the GST from 7% to 5% is something they&#039;ve done for families is nonsense, given that they&#039;re pushing the HST across the country which will, in some cases (housing, as you&#039;ve pointed out) add an additional tax burden to families. 

I don&#039;t object to paying taxes -- no matter whether they&#039;re called municipal, federal or provincial taxes, in the final analysis, they&#039;re what make it possible for anyone in this country to educate their children, get medical attention, drive on roads, and so on. What I object to is a tax that hits everyone by a percentage of the cost of the product rather than a percentage based on income. The people hardest hit by these kinds of taxes are the people who don&#039;t have the luxury of even thinking about buying homes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a transit credit already &#8212; the federal Cons&#8217; website IDs it as one of the things they&#8217;ve done for families. However, it only applies to people who buy monthly transit passes. In the GVR, if you use transit less than 40 times per month, it&#8217;s not worth it to buy a monthly pass. So even you work a four-day week and use transit 32 times a month to get to and from work, you can&#8217;t claim the tax credit.</p>
<p>Books and periodicals were not taxed (in BC) until the GST came in. This is not about complex funding agreements for education. It&#8217;s about creating an exemption for the GST on books, etc, which are arguably instruments of learning (and democracy) no matter what age they&#8217;re aimed at. According to deloitte.com, &#8220;there will be point of sale rebates of the provincial portion of HST on motor fuels, books, children-sized clothing and footwear, children’s car seats and car booster seats, diapers and feminine hygiene products&#8221; &#8212; so books will continue to be taxed at 5% (current GST) instead of 12% (HST).</p>
<p>The HST may have been a federal initiative, but we wouldn&#8217;t be having this discussion if Mulroney&#8217;s conservatives hadn&#8217;t brought in the GST in 1991. I don&#8217;t recall writing that I expect an army of protesters; I wrote that the Conservatives claiming on their website that reducing the GST from 7% to 5% is something they&#8217;ve done for families is nonsense, given that they&#8217;re pushing the HST across the country which will, in some cases (housing, as you&#8217;ve pointed out) add an additional tax burden to families. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t object to paying taxes &#8212; no matter whether they&#8217;re called municipal, federal or provincial taxes, in the final analysis, they&#8217;re what make it possible for anyone in this country to educate their children, get medical attention, drive on roads, and so on. What I object to is a tax that hits everyone by a percentage of the cost of the product rather than a percentage based on income. The people hardest hit by these kinds of taxes are the people who don&#8217;t have the luxury of even thinking about buying homes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Martin</title>
		<link>http://informedvote.ca/2009/10/20/what-do-nov-9-by-elections-yawn-mean-for-child-youth-and-family-advocates/comment-page-1/#comment-3515</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informedvote.ca/?p=1095#comment-3515</guid>
		<description>A transit credit can not go to those who take public transit because of our shortsighted constitution. There can be no infringement of federal influence into the domain of exclusively provincial domains. Public transit in the GVR is funded by ...you guessed it the province. If the feds gave a tax credit then this would be a de facto funding of Provinces. This would effectively mix the federal and provincial budgets and this is not allowed.  So the answer to that is easy. Same reasoning applies to textbooks. Education is Provincially funded but propped up by the Feds through a series of bilateral agreements with the provinces. It is through these agreements that textbook funding can take place - in much the same manner that you are allowed to apply for your federal and provincial student loans.  To extend a fund to all books, though, would confuse existing programs run by the province and impair them from running book-funding programs for which the provinces are better suited to run than the Feds. 

I can agree with you that HST is rather evil. Especially for homeowners. It is not going anywhere and will eventually be nationwide. There is not a single party that seriously opposes it - well the NDP want to but they are only 16% of the electorate. Notice how the Liberals have been hush hush on it.  That is because it was their initiative. HST has been a reality on the East Coast for sometime now and is seems as both a cash grab and a way to reduce administration fees. Still Canadian, it would seem by their lack of collective action don&#039;t mind paying extra money for a home in the middle of recession because there have not been floods and floods of protest.  There have been a few, I don&#039;t deny Bill Vanderzam making a good go at it, but truthfully I don&#039;t think Canadians ca even be bothered to understand taxes and tax law so do you really expect an army of highly paid accountants who can write of HST easier than they did the two taxes, and benefit from HST making their job easier, to make a collective stand against this on behalf of Canadians.  I said screw this country a long time ago which I why my Corp. is registered in Hong Kong and I only pay 12% tax period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A transit credit can not go to those who take public transit because of our shortsighted constitution. There can be no infringement of federal influence into the domain of exclusively provincial domains. Public transit in the GVR is funded by &#8230;you guessed it the province. If the feds gave a tax credit then this would be a de facto funding of Provinces. This would effectively mix the federal and provincial budgets and this is not allowed.  So the answer to that is easy. Same reasoning applies to textbooks. Education is Provincially funded but propped up by the Feds through a series of bilateral agreements with the provinces. It is through these agreements that textbook funding can take place &#8211; in much the same manner that you are allowed to apply for your federal and provincial student loans.  To extend a fund to all books, though, would confuse existing programs run by the province and impair them from running book-funding programs for which the provinces are better suited to run than the Feds. </p>
<p>I can agree with you that HST is rather evil. Especially for homeowners. It is not going anywhere and will eventually be nationwide. There is not a single party that seriously opposes it &#8211; well the NDP want to but they are only 16% of the electorate. Notice how the Liberals have been hush hush on it.  That is because it was their initiative. HST has been a reality on the East Coast for sometime now and is seems as both a cash grab and a way to reduce administration fees. Still Canadian, it would seem by their lack of collective action don&#8217;t mind paying extra money for a home in the middle of recession because there have not been floods and floods of protest.  There have been a few, I don&#8217;t deny Bill Vanderzam making a good go at it, but truthfully I don&#8217;t think Canadians ca even be bothered to understand taxes and tax law so do you really expect an army of highly paid accountants who can write of HST easier than they did the two taxes, and benefit from HST making their job easier, to make a collective stand against this on behalf of Canadians.  I said screw this country a long time ago which I why my Corp. is registered in Hong Kong and I only pay 12% tax period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne Melcombe</title>
		<link>http://informedvote.ca/2009/10/20/what-do-nov-9-by-elections-yawn-mean-for-child-youth-and-family-advocates/comment-page-1/#comment-3513</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne Melcombe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informedvote.ca/?p=1095#comment-3513</guid>
		<description>I stand corrected. But it doesn&#039;t change the substance of what I&#039;m saying: that when you look at the Conservatives from a child, youth, and family perspective, their record speaks for itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand corrected. But it doesn&#8217;t change the substance of what I&#8217;m saying: that when you look at the Conservatives from a child, youth, and family perspective, their record speaks for itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://informedvote.ca/2009/10/20/what-do-nov-9-by-elections-yawn-mean-for-child-youth-and-family-advocates/comment-page-1/#comment-3508</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informedvote.ca/?p=1095#comment-3508</guid>
		<description>As you call yourself &quot;informed vote&quot; it troubles me that for the Cumberland Colchester Musquodoboit Valley By-election you claim it to be a two way race between the Conservatives and the NDP. Yet an Ekos poll recently released placed the Conservative and the Liberals, not the NDP, within less than three percentage points of each other, well within he percentage of error. 
If you really do wish to make readers informed voters, then report the facts, not your opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you call yourself &#8220;informed vote&#8221; it troubles me that for the Cumberland Colchester Musquodoboit Valley By-election you claim it to be a two way race between the Conservatives and the NDP. Yet an Ekos poll recently released placed the Conservative and the Liberals, not the NDP, within less than three percentage points of each other, well within he percentage of error.<br />
If you really do wish to make readers informed voters, then report the facts, not your opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

