Creationism vs. Science: The Canadian Front
Wednesday, March 25th, 2009A month ago, if you had asked the average Canadian who Gary Goodyear is, she or he likely would have responded that Gary had something to do with car tires. Not so anymore. Gary Goodyear, a Conservative Member of Parliament for Cambridge and Minister of State for Science and Technology, has made the news recently for comments he made regarding evolution. Evidently, he was asked if he believed in evolution, and responded that he felt it was inappropriate for the reporter to question his beliefs as a Christian (I’m paraphrasing here). This story probably would have been nothing more than filler material in the Globe & Mail if Mr. Goodyear was a regular, run-of-the-mill MP, but because of his Cabinet position as Minister of State for Science and Technology, it raised a few eyebrows. Obviously the fear is that Mr. Goodyear may not be willing to designate funding for scientific research that is not in accordance with his Christian beliefs, and make no mistake, that is a legitimate fear to have. However, I have not yet seen evidence that would suggest that Mr. Goodyear has allocated funding based on his beliefs. If this was the case, he should be replaced immediately. In actuality, the Harper government has been underfunding all scientific disciplines, regardless of their research. But for the moment, I am willing to give Mr. Goodyear the benefit of the doubt. Do I agree with his beliefs? No. Do I think his attempt to state his belief in evolution was rather pathetic? Yes. But I don’t think his beliefs necessarily proclude him from performing his job.
(more…)
In a world of rising energy prices, a growing demand for clean and sustainable energy and a growing demand to mitigate climate change, should we be constructing new coal power plans or other high green house gas (GHG) emitting power sources?
With the Conservatives already planning their attack ads against Michael Ignatieff in preparation for the next election, one has to wonder just how swayed they can expect the public to be against their second straight Liberal opponent in under a year. Ignatieff has laughed off the threat, sarcastically quipping that he’s “shaking” at the thought. Defiant words, considering the negative impact the relentless bombardment of attack ads directed at Stéphane Dion had. Now it’s the same party with a different personality at the helm, but perhaps that projection of confidence, the cocky/defiant confidence which the more appeasing Dion lacked, is exactly what might bolster the new leader with voters and put the Grits back into office. It’s possible, for what makes a party worthy of governance, and what makes their leader resonate with voters doesn’t seem to be the same thing necessarily, and the Grits numbers have improved since Ignatieff became leader of the party. But is it enough? Will his personality triumph over the inevitable onslaught of smears? Or does anyone really care? Ignatieff, while seemingly more popular than Dion, still doesn’t inspire the same kind of political zeal in Canada that Barack Obama has in the US (or in Canada for that matter). In fact, just about the only safe bet in Canadian poltics these days would be if Barack Obama ran for, well… anything. You see, Canadians are Obama crazy. In fact, some polls during Obama’s presidential campaign run suggested a staggering 80% of Canadians would have voted for Obama given the chance. 80% in any democracy is beyond a landslide. It’s actually getting into ‘was that rigged?’ territory. When Obama visited Ottawa for a few hours a couple weeks ago, Canadians scrambled from all over to get to Ottawa, just to get a chance not to see him. So it’s fair to say that Canadians have Obama mania. It’s all somewhat understandable; by all accounts he is a bright, principled man, but what’s more than that, he’s clearly an exceptional orator, inspiring the basic fibers of inspiration wherever and whenever he speaks, so much so that he unfortunately seems to trigger a reflexive Canadian self-loathing anxiety. For as much as Canadians love Obama, they can’t seem to talk about him without lamenting about the state of their own politics; carrying on about how they ‘wish we could have an Obama’, ‘our politics are boring,’ etc. It’s envy as much as it is mania, and it’s an attitude that’s replete in Canada. Where and how Canadians get this attitude is somewhat of a mystery, because Canadian politics, like the politics of any country, can be very interesting, and there are plenty of good politicians in the fold. So why the self hate?