<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jon Stewart: The Last Crusader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedvote.ca/2009/03/16/jon-stewart-the-last-crusader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedvote.ca/2009/03/16/jon-stewart-the-last-crusader/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=jon-stewart-the-last-crusader</link>
	<description>Informed Vote (informedvote.ca) will keep Canadian voters informed on Canadian Politics such as Stephen Harper, Michael Ignatieff, Jack Layton, Liberals, Conservatives, NDP, Green, as well as foreign issues like the Israel palestine conflict and local issues like the CUPE strike</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 07:31:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://informedvote.ca/2009/03/16/jon-stewart-the-last-crusader/comment-page-1/#comment-3276</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informedvote.ca/?p=821#comment-3276</guid>
		<description>Jon Stewart&#039;s 75 year old mother lost her money in these investment plans that Cramer and CNBC were touting. So you&#039;ll excuse him Brian if he was angry at these lying con artists. And besides, what the hell were you watching? He gave Cramer enough time to explain himself, and Cramer did a piss poor job in doing so. Jon Stewart doesn&#039;t do anything half seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon Stewart&#8217;s 75 year old mother lost her money in these investment plans that Cramer and CNBC were touting. So you&#8217;ll excuse him Brian if he was angry at these lying con artists. And besides, what the hell were you watching? He gave Cramer enough time to explain himself, and Cramer did a piss poor job in doing so. Jon Stewart doesn&#8217;t do anything half seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cauley</title>
		<link>http://informedvote.ca/2009/03/16/jon-stewart-the-last-crusader/comment-page-1/#comment-3184</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cauley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informedvote.ca/?p=821#comment-3184</guid>
		<description>What about the Rick Mercer Report? I like some of the style about Jon Stewart, but I don&#039;t like Jon Stewart. He seems to take the issues he is talking about only half seriously. His &quot;interview&quot; with Cramer was more of a rehearsed lecture by Stewart. Yeah, Cramer did engage in many dubious acts, but if Jon Stewart had the confidence he would have allowed Cramer to rebut most of the attacks. Instead, we saw a verbal lashing that the audience gobbled up. Remember, the Comedy Network is filled with people who are willing to twist facts for entertainment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the Rick Mercer Report? I like some of the style about Jon Stewart, but I don&#8217;t like Jon Stewart. He seems to take the issues he is talking about only half seriously. His &#8220;interview&#8221; with Cramer was more of a rehearsed lecture by Stewart. Yeah, Cramer did engage in many dubious acts, but if Jon Stewart had the confidence he would have allowed Cramer to rebut most of the attacks. Instead, we saw a verbal lashing that the audience gobbled up. Remember, the Comedy Network is filled with people who are willing to twist facts for entertainment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

