Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympics Controversy Grows

The Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympics are Brewing Constroversy
With the 2010 Winter Olympics just about a year away, controversy plagues the city of Vancouver. The reason? Mismanagement of the Vancouver Olympic Village which has led to a “financial crisis” for the city.
To sum up in one sentence – Vancouver Olympic organizers screwed up, and the citizens of Vancouver are expected to pay for it. It seems like ordinary citizens paying for others’ failures via tax dollars is a recurring theme nowadays.
In a move that seemed reasonable at the time, and in line with what other past Olympic hosts have done in the past, the City of Vancouver and the Vancouver Organizing Committee decided to build an Olympic Village that would be later sold as apartments or condos. The project was to be built by Millennium Development Corporation and financed by Fortress Investment Group (FIG), a U.S. hedge fund. The project was budgeted at $750 million and construction was to be finished by November 2009.
Not only is the village nowhere near being constructed, it’s already $125 million over its budget. To further complicated matters, pre-sales of condos are down, and so are their selling prices as a result of economic woes. Aside from the $317 million already loaned to Millennium Development Corp. by FIG, the remaining tab, potentially $1 billion, may be dumped on Vancouver’s taxpayers. It seems like Vancouver’s politicians forgot about the “completion guarantee” they signed just two years ago, backing the project fully.
What’s even more angering, especially to Vancouverites, is the lack of accountability and transparency of their government. Just a few months ago, Vancouver issued an emergency $100 million loan to keep work on the Olympic village going, negotiated in secret without notifying the people of Vancouver. And just last week, Vancouver was seeking an emergency session of the provincial legislature, asking for emergency authority to borrow $458 million, which normally would require a public vote. In this case, they claim, there just isn’t time to ask the public, hence the emergency. They were granted the money, having to alter the city’s charter to make it possible without public consent.
Vancouver hasn’t even bothered to ask the federal government for funding. Prime Minister Stephen Harper stated: “I will be crystal clear. We will not be funding cost overruns at the Olympic Village.”
We’re seeing governments across the world bailing out all sorts of corporations with taxpayer money. First the U.S. and the financial industry, then their auto industry. Canada shortly followed suit, bailing out their own auto industry. And now there is talk of the UK bailing out their financial and auto industries. Should Vancouver be allowed to jump on the bandwagon and finance the rest of the Olympic village project with their taxpayers money too?
Related posts:
- Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympics Protest: “RIOT 2010!” – Um, Can You Take It Easy With That? All protest is about anger – someone said that in...
- Exclusion of Women’s Ski Jumping from the Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympics is a Supreme Court of Canada Cop-Out On December 22nd, the Supreme Court of Canada refused to...
- New Vancouver Heroin Dispensing Clinic Set to Open Before the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics The dispensing of heroin by SALOME in Vancouver, although controversial...
- Canadians Can Now Stop the Hand-wringing and Can Now Celebrate Our Sporting Victories, But How Large Was Our 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympic Victory Really? Canadians can now stop the hand-wringing, and finally we can...
- How to Love, Hate, Protest, and Otherwise Not Care About the Vancouver 2010 Olympic Winter Games I am a pragmatist. I am not a Gordon...
Tags: 2010 winter olympics, controversy, olympic village, vancouver
January 19th, 2009 at 9:39 pm
[...] Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympics Controversy Grows | Political News … [...]
January 20th, 2009 at 1:17 am
Whats wrong? Its the olympics. No matter what the problem is, and no matter how much it will cost, the government will end up funding it. Vancouver will have the international spotlight on it and therefore must operate a smooth and exquisite olympics which means not sparing any costs. Harper’s statement? BS! If there is no money leftover to fund the games, the federal government will 100% finance whatever else is needed.
February 13th, 2010 at 12:07 am
I have mixed feelings because on one hand it’s an amazing experience to be in a city where such an event is being held. On the other hand I can’t stand the fact that nothing is being done to solve the problem of homeleseness and rampant drug addiction. Also I am disgusted at what happened at the Luge track. I think that Nodar Kumaritashvili’s death could have been prevented.
February 15th, 2010 at 6:13 am
The Olympics have never been economically viable “Jumpin’ Granny” this is the reason governments do get too involved. As well it’s a venue for companies and this is why VANOC is very strict regarding advertising, the strictes from all other hosts. With recession and people losing their jobs it would political suicide to fund a two week party when so many other pressing things are on the table.