I am absolutely not talking about a theoretical concept. It’s the other way around. If you are claiming a “right” then you are obligated to display it in some fashion to claim. You have done nothing of the sort. You didn’t even state yourself whether the practice is actual because I suspect you know it is not.

I explained the “practical” aspect and gave clear examples.

Israel has no right to commit aggression. There is a clear alternative, and it is even persistently recognized by Israel’s supposed antagonist, Hamas. Israel must end it’s illegal crimes and part of that is the siege and illegal collective punishment of Gazans, and brutally despicable occupation of Palestine. The reasons you site for Hamas’s violence, a lack to recognize Israel’s “right to exist” is ridiculous. It’s Israel’s decades long crimes and recent crimes.

What you call the “facts”, one side attacking civilians and the other attacking terrorists, is blatantly not fact. Israel overwhelmingly kills more civilians. There is nothing which indicates different other than Israel’s word, and if we accept the intent and word of those who kill, than you can’t just extend that rational to Israel and must extend it to other killers intents too. A tricky line to follow, especially if you apply it to Hamas’s intention. Facts, are Israel kills more by extremely disparaging numbers, even outside the recent massacre.

Your “bias” free analogy missed one component to be bias-less, and that is an entire other side. Hamas are religious extremists, and former terrorists turned quasi-government, but they are certainly not firing rockets for the reasons you’d like to think or your imagined analogy leaves out.

Many countries in the past have claimed or denied other countries a right to exist.

Egypt recognized Israel’s right to exist.
The Palestinians feel their state has a right to exist.
Turkey, and other countries, too, have all made comments about rights to exist.

You are taking a theoretical concept and trying to apply it to this situation but really need to look at the practicle aspect, which you conveniently keep avoiding.

Israel doesn’t have a right to exist. Neither does Palestine, Canada, or any state for that matter because there is no such thing as an existence right. If you just think about it for a moment you will not only realize that you can’t find this non-existent right, but it doesn’t even make sense. States are democratic institutions and are mailable. There is nothing that says a state must exist. As Canadians we can legally dismantle Canada if we so choose. There is nothing that says Canada must exist. Does Quebec have a right to exist as a sovereign state, or does Canada have a right to exist within Quebec as a sovereign state? There just is no such thing as a right to exist over democratic institutions. The idea is one counter to democracy.

Oddly only one state in the world claims this “right to exist”, and that is Israel. Not surprising is that only one people in the world are expected to recognize this as well, and that is the Palestinians. This bizarre set-up of propaganda is so effective that, not only does it overcome the barriers of not-existing, as I mentioned, but also even if true would be false. Israel doesn’t have any right at all to annex the Palestinian state. Israel’s state borders are completely illegally under numerous international law and rulings. Israel doesn’t have a right to exist where it currently is. That’s the law.

The entire thing is a fascinating achievement in propaganda.

Thanks to Israel for what they are doing !

And don’t forget, they (Hamas) do kill their own people (children and woman )to show the world that it is Israel work. and put them in the most denger places in the front.

They are using our moral in their favor. and they realy don’t mind and intend to kill you chilldren.

Wake Up, The war soon be here !!!

Let us imagine that a band of people come into your home heavily armed and take it over.